Merge pull request #51212 from Faless/net/3.3_ip_lock_fix
[3.3] [Net] Fix IP address resolution incorrectly locking the main thread.
This commit is contained in:
commit
6b15d9a435
@ -83,12 +83,19 @@ struct _IP_ResolverPrivate {
|
||||
|
||||
if (queue[i].status.get() != IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_WAITING)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
queue[i].response = IP::get_singleton()->resolve_hostname(queue[i].hostname, queue[i].type);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!queue[i].response.is_valid())
|
||||
queue[i].status.set(IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_ERROR);
|
||||
else
|
||||
queue[i].status.set(IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_DONE);
|
||||
mutex.lock();
|
||||
String hostname = queue[i].hostname;
|
||||
IP::Type type = queue[i].type;
|
||||
mutex.unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
// We should not lock while resolving the hostname,
|
||||
// only when modifying the queue.
|
||||
IP_Address response = IP::get_singleton()->resolve_hostname(hostname, type);
|
||||
|
||||
MutexLock lock(mutex);
|
||||
queue[i].response = response;
|
||||
queue[i].status.set(response.is_valid() ? IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_DONE : IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_ERROR);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -97,12 +104,8 @@ struct _IP_ResolverPrivate {
|
||||
_IP_ResolverPrivate *ipr = (_IP_ResolverPrivate *)self;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!ipr->thread_abort) {
|
||||
|
||||
ipr->sem.wait();
|
||||
|
||||
ipr->mutex.lock();
|
||||
ipr->resolve_queues();
|
||||
ipr->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -114,19 +117,24 @@ struct _IP_ResolverPrivate {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
IP_Address IP::resolve_hostname(const String &p_hostname, IP::Type p_type) {
|
||||
String key = _IP_ResolverPrivate::get_cache_key(p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
IP_Address res;
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
|
||||
String key = _IP_ResolverPrivate::get_cache_key(p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
if (resolver->cache.has(key) && resolver->cache[key].is_valid()) {
|
||||
IP_Address res = resolver->cache[key];
|
||||
res = resolver->cache[key];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// This should be run unlocked so the resolver thread can keep
|
||||
// resolving other requests.
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
res = _resolve_hostname(p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
// We might be overriding another result, but we don't care (they are the
|
||||
// same hostname).
|
||||
resolver->cache[key] = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
IP_Address res = _resolve_hostname(p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
resolver->cache[key] = res;
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -165,15 +173,10 @@ IP::ResolverStatus IP::get_resolve_item_status(ResolverID p_id) const {
|
||||
|
||||
ERR_FAIL_INDEX_V(p_id, IP::RESOLVER_MAX_QUERIES, IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE);
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
if (resolver->queue[p_id].status.get() == IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE) {
|
||||
ERR_PRINT("Condition status == IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE");
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
return IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
IP::ResolverStatus res = resolver->queue[p_id].status.get();
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
if (res == IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE) {
|
||||
ERR_PRINT("Condition status == IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -199,11 +202,7 @@ void IP::erase_resolve_item(ResolverID p_id) {
|
||||
|
||||
ERR_FAIL_INDEX(p_id, IP::RESOLVER_MAX_QUERIES);
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->queue[p_id].status.set(IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_NONE);
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void IP::clear_cache(const String &p_hostname) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user