Fix selecting recent node in CreateDialog
If the node name matches exactly as the search, the node should be selected. This also fixes when the user clicks on recent nodes. Fixes #24044
This commit is contained in:
parent
9762372329
commit
a8a293832e
|
@ -191,34 +191,41 @@ void CreateDialog::add_type(const String &p_type, HashMap<String, TreeItem *> &p
|
|||
item->set_custom_color(0, get_color("disabled_font_color", "Editor"));
|
||||
item->set_selectable(0, false);
|
||||
} else if (!(*to_select && (*to_select)->get_text(0) == search_box->get_text())) {
|
||||
bool current_type_prefered = _is_type_prefered(p_type);
|
||||
bool selected_type_prefered = *to_select ? _is_type_prefered((*to_select)->get_text(0).split(" ")[0]) : false;
|
||||
|
||||
String search_term = search_box->get_text().to_lower();
|
||||
bool is_subsequence_of_type = search_box->get_text().is_subsequence_ofi(p_type);
|
||||
bool is_substring_of_type = p_type.to_lower().find(search_term) >= 0;
|
||||
bool is_substring_of_selected = false;
|
||||
bool is_subsequence_of_selected = false;
|
||||
bool is_selected_equal = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (*to_select) {
|
||||
String name = (*to_select)->get_text(0).split(" ")[0].to_lower();
|
||||
is_substring_of_selected = name.find(search_term) >= 0;
|
||||
is_subsequence_of_selected = search_term.is_subsequence_of(name);
|
||||
is_selected_equal = name == search_term;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// if the node name matches exactly as the search, the node should be selected.
|
||||
// this also fixes when the user clicks on recent nodes.
|
||||
if (p_type.to_lower() == search_term) {
|
||||
*to_select = item;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
bool current_type_prefered = _is_type_prefered(p_type);
|
||||
bool selected_type_prefered = *to_select ? _is_type_prefered((*to_select)->get_text(0).split(" ")[0]) : false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_subsequence_of_type && !is_selected_equal) {
|
||||
if (is_substring_of_type) {
|
||||
if (!is_substring_of_selected || (current_type_prefered && !selected_type_prefered)) {
|
||||
*to_select = item;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// substring results weigh more than subsequences, so let's make sure we don't override them
|
||||
if (!is_substring_of_selected) {
|
||||
if (!is_subsequence_of_selected || (current_type_prefered && !selected_type_prefered)) {
|
||||
bool is_subsequence_of_type = search_box->get_text().is_subsequence_ofi(p_type);
|
||||
bool is_substring_of_type = p_type.to_lower().find(search_term) >= 0;
|
||||
bool is_substring_of_selected = false;
|
||||
bool is_subsequence_of_selected = false;
|
||||
bool is_selected_equal = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (*to_select) {
|
||||
String name = (*to_select)->get_text(0).split(" ")[0].to_lower();
|
||||
is_substring_of_selected = name.find(search_term) >= 0;
|
||||
is_subsequence_of_selected = search_term.is_subsequence_of(name);
|
||||
is_selected_equal = name == search_term;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_subsequence_of_type && !is_selected_equal) {
|
||||
if (is_substring_of_type) {
|
||||
if (!is_substring_of_selected || (current_type_prefered && !selected_type_prefered)) {
|
||||
*to_select = item;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// substring results weigh more than subsequences, so let's make sure we don't override them
|
||||
if (!is_substring_of_selected) {
|
||||
if (!is_subsequence_of_selected || (current_type_prefered && !selected_type_prefered)) {
|
||||
*to_select = item;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue