better unique name resolution, as suggested i #3017
This commit is contained in:
parent
9637460331
commit
ecad3a285f
@ -700,11 +700,7 @@ void Node::_validate_child_name(Node *p_child, bool p_force_human_readable) {
|
||||
if (!unique) {
|
||||
|
||||
node_hrcr_count.ref();
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG_ENABLED
|
||||
String name = "@"+String(p_child->get_type_name())+itos(node_hrcr_count.get());
|
||||
#else
|
||||
String name = "@"+itos(node_hrcr_count.get());
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
String name = "@"+String(p_child->get_name())+"@"+itos(node_hrcr_count.get());
|
||||
p_child->data.name=name;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user