Happy new year to the wonderful Godot community!
2020 has been a tough year for most of us personally, but a good year for
Godot development nonetheless with a huge amount of work done towards Godot
4.0 and great improvements backported to the long-lived 3.2 branch.
We've had close to 400 contributors to engine code this year, authoring near
7,000 commit! (And that's only for the `master` branch and for the engine code,
there's a lot more when counting docs, demos and other first-party repos.)
Here's to a great year 2021 for all Godot users 🎆
Fixes#44761, was a regression from #44524.
The PR passed CI because EditorNode::get_viewport() used to shadow Node::get_viewport()
(which was a bug in itself, fixed by #44524), so once it was renamed the existing code
relying on it fell back to the now available Node::get_viewport().
This might bite some thirdparty modules too.
Resolvesgodotengine/godot-proposals#1246.
It is difficult to tell the difference between the handles for adjusting
curves and the points themselves when looking at a Path gizmo.
This re-uses the icons used for Path2D.
Unlike Path2D, this does not use a different icon for smooth vs sharp
points, as using a potentially different material for each point would
prevent batching the points in add_handles (and adding them out-of-order
messes up other logic based on handle indices).
This includes a public API change to allow specifying a texture for a
handle material. This allows spatial gizmo plugins to customize the way
a handle is rendered, if desired, but does not break existing behavior
(as providing no texture uses the default).
The path handle icons were resized as well. 16x16 is the standard icon
size. These icons were 10x10 rather than 16x16, and appeared rather
small in the editor.
To resize, I:
- Opened the original in Inkscape
- Resized the document to 16x16
- Opened the transform dialog
- Scaled by 160% proportionally
- Used Align/Distribute to center on the page
- Saved the document
- Cleaned with `svgcleaner --multipass`
ToolButton has no redeeming differences with Button;
it's just a Button with the Flat property enabled by default.
Removing it avoids some confusion when creating GUIs.
Existing ToolButtons will be converted to Buttons, but the Flat
property won't be enabled automatically.
This closes https://github.com/godotengine/godot-proposals/issues/1081.
I couldn't find a tool that enforces it, so I went the manual route:
```
find -name "thirdparty" -prune \
-o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.m" -o -name "*.mm" \
-o -name "*.glsl" > files
perl -0777 -pi -e 's/\n}\n([^#])/\n}\n\n\1/g' $(cat files)
misc/scripts/fix_style.sh -c
```
This adds a newline after all `}` on the first column, unless they
are followed by `#` (typically `#endif`). This leads to having lots
of places with two lines between function/class definitions, but
clang-format then fixes it as we enforce max one line of separation.
This doesn't fix potential occurrences of function definitions which
are indented (e.g. for a helper class defined in a .cpp), but it's
better than nothing. Also can't be made to run easily on CI/hooks so
we'll have to be careful with new code.
Part of #33027.
Which means that reduz' beloved style which we all became used to
will now be changed automatically to remove the first empty line.
This makes us lean closer to 1TBS (the one true brace style) instead
of hybridating it with some Allman-inspired spacing.
There's still the case of braces around single-statement blocks that
needs to be addressed (but clang-format can't help with that, but
clang-tidy may if we agree about it).
Part of #33027.
Part of #33027, also discussed in #29848.
Enforcing the use of brackets even on single line statements would be
preferred, but `clang-format` doesn't have this functionality yet.
