rwf2
/
Rocket
mirror of https://github.com/rwf2/Rocket.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add Iron to the benchmark mix.

This commit is contained in:
Sergio Benitez 2017-01-11 14:53:04 -08:00
parent dbd427b433
commit 31e80cb07b
1 changed files with 22 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

31
README.md
View File

@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ Rocket is designed to be performant. At this time, its performance is
[bottlenecked by the Hyper HTTP
library](https://github.com/SergioBenitez/Rocket/issues/17). Even so, Rocket
currently performs _better_ than the latest version of Hyper on a simple "Hello,
world!" benchmark:
world!" benchmark. Rocket also performs better than the Iron web framework:
**Machine Specs:**
@ -157,6 +157,17 @@ world!" benchmark:
* **Processor:** Intel Xeon X5675 @ 3.07GHz
* **Operating System:** Mac OS X v10.11.6
**Rocket v0.1.4** (8 LOC) results (best of 3, +/- 1000 req/s, +/- 5us latency):
Running 10s test @ http://localhost:80
2 threads and 10 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 162.40us 28.41us 377.00us 69.21%
Req/Sec 29.88k 1.29k 33.72k 70.30%
600412 requests in 10.10s, 83.60MB read
Requests/sec: 59448.48
Transfer/sec: 8.28MB
**Hyper v0.10.0-a.0** (46 LOC) results (best of 3, +/- 2000 req/s, +/- 10us latency):
Running 10s test @ http://localhost:80
@ -168,21 +179,23 @@ world!" benchmark:
Requests/sec: 55715.98
Transfer/sec: 8.08MB
**Rocket v0.1.0** (8 LOC) results (best of 3, +/- 1000 req/s, +/- 5us latency):
**Iron v0.4.0** (11 LOC) results (best of 3, +/- 1000 req/s, +/- 5us latency):
Running 10s test @ http://localhost:80
2 threads and 10 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 161.33us 37.40us 2.08ms 75.89%
Req/Sec 30.10k 1.13k 33.28k 72.77%
604782 requests in 10.10s, 84.21MB read
Requests/sec: 59883.30
Transfer/sec: 8.34MB
Latency 189.93us 40.05us 2.06ms 67.57%
Req/Sec 25.80k 2.26k 34.01k 77.72%
518575 requests in 10.10s, 64.79MB read
Requests/sec: 51346.00
Transfer/sec: 6.41MB
**Summary:**
* Rocket throughput higher by 7.5% (higher is better).
* Rocket latency lower by 7.8% (lower is better).
* Rocket throughput higher by 6.7% (higher is better) compared to Hyper.
* Rocket throughput higher by 15.8% (higher is better) compared to Iron.
* Rocket latency lower by 7.3% (lower is better) compared to Hyper.
* Rocket latency lower by 14.5% (lower is better) compared to Iron.
### Future Improvements