Prior to this commit, 'Vec', 'HashMap', and 'BTreeMap' would parse
leniently irrespetive of the requested parsing strategy. This commit
changes their behavior so that the parsing strategy is respected.
Resolves#2131.
In cc98f98, logging was changed to use a new 'write_out!' macro that
internally used 'write!' instead of 'print!' to log. This had an
unfortunate side-effect: 'libtest' via 'cargo test' no longer captures
the log output of tests.
The reason this occurs is due to the way that Cargo, or rather
`libtest`, captures log output: it uses hidden, unstable functions that
replace a special sink that `print!`, and _only_ `print!` writes to.
Using `write!` directly, as the commit does, bypasses this sink, and so
`cargo` never captures the output.
As a compromise, we only use the better implementation when we're not
compiled with `debug_assertions` or running tests, so at least tests run
in debug-mode won't spew output.
Also updates 'tokio-rustls' to a compatible version.
Additionally depends on 'rustls-pemfile' which includes functionality
that was previously part of 'rustls' itself.
This commit removes the 'CookieJar::get_private_pending()' method in
favor of the already existing and correct 'CookieJar::get_pending()'
method. Previously, the 'CookieJar::get_private_pending()' method
attempted to decrypt the value of a pending cookie, which in reality is
plaintext, thus failing. Because the pending value is plaintext, the
'CookieJar::get_pending()' method suffices.
Documentation has been updated to refer to 'CookieJar::get_pending()'.
Fixes#2063.
This commit implements a workaround for an [issue within rustc]. The
problem showed itself when using e.g. a `Vec<&str>` argument in an async
route handler (but not `&str`), which resulted in a "implementation of
`FromForm` is not general enough" error. The workaround itself works by
gathering all invocations of `FromForm`'s methods inside a block without
any `.await` points [ref].
[issue within rustc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69663
[ref]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57478#issuecomment-501186084
