This makes it easier to spot syntax errors when editing the
class reference. The schema is referenced locally so validation
can still work offline.
Each class XML's schema conformance is also checked on GitHub Actions.
For the time being we don't support writing a description for those, preferring
having all details in the method's description.
Using self-closing tags saves half the lines, and prevents contributors from
thinking that they should write the argument or return documentation there.
(cherry picked from commit 7adf4cc9b5)
We already removed it from the online docs with #35132.
Currently it can only be "Built-In Types" (Variant types) or "Core"
(everything else), which is of limited use.
We might also want to consider dropping it from `ClassDB` altogether
in Godot 4.0.
- Add some missing descriptions.
- Add links to tutorials for ARVR and AnimationTree.
- Style fixes.
- Engine changes:
* Make `AnimationNodeTransition.input_<number>` properties internal
so that they don't appear in the docs. They still appear in the
inspector based on the actual number of inputs requested.
* Drop unimplemented `CPUParticles.flatness`. It's only used for 3D
particles in `ParticlesMaterial`, and thus only relevant for
`CPUParticles3D`.
- Document a few more properties and methods
- Add more information to many classes
- Fix lots of typos and gramar mistakes
- Use [code] tags for parameters consistently
- Use [b] and [i] tags consistently
- Put "Warning:" and "Note:" on their own line to be more visible,
and make them always bold
- Tweak formatting in code examples to be more readable
- Use double quotes consistently
- Add more links to third-party technologies
I haven't put [code] bbcode around the amount of the AnimationNodeAdd* classes
because it's not exposed to GDScript.
Same for the +add, -add, etc. labels: they're just labels you can find in the
AnimationTree bottom panel.
The API docs for various animation nodes are pretty empty, yet the
tutorial at
https://docs.godotengine.org/en/latest/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html
contains some details.
These details should be included in the API docs so looking up a
particular class actually provides some information rather than
requiring the user to hunt for a different tutorial.
This also links the AnimationTree tutorial and demo in the docs.
I've found the TPS demo to be the best resource so far for learning
how to use the AnimationTree. This should be easy to find if someone
looks up the AnimationTree API docs.
Finally, this fixes a param typo in AnimationNodeStateMachine.
